<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>MyTCGplayer ::  mikeg542 :: Blogs</title> 
	<link>http://my.tcgplayer.com/user/mikeg542/blogs</link> 
	<description>some descr about blogs</description>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Breaking (hypothetically) the LRW Meta]]></title>
		<link>http://my.tcgplayer.com/blog/view/id_1876</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction As it was so kindly pointed out to me, the meta for this format can’t really be known until MTGO events start happening with SHM added to the barely developed LRW block. Disregarding th]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:09:26 -0500</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Breaking the Meta LRW Block Contructed]]></title>
		<link>http://my.tcgplayer.com/blog/view/id_1833</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I’m back sooner then expected, and I can just hear you all cheering now. Sarcasm aside, further testing and meta-delving done by my testing compatriots and myself have revealed a few powerful d]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:40:20 -0500</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Breaking (or Making!) the Lorwyn Block Metagame]]></title>
		<link>http://my.tcgplayer.com/blog/view/id_1806</link>
		<description><![CDATA[IntroductionIt’s that time of year again, a new PTQ season coming in a little over a month with a new, untried format waiting to be delved for powerful combos, decks and archetypes. While I may not ]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:13:52 -0500</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>