Wow...you got a nice thought process there. Although I do disagree with some things, what you said makes a lot of sense.

As for what I disagree:

There are other players for me than those three you described:

-There are the Casual players.

- The Competitive players

- The Aggressive players

-The Passive players

- The Conservative players

- The control players

As you said, there are lots of decks depending on the player-build-the destination of the deck, to understand how you can maximize your success with the decks you build, you need to understand each of those factors. Since I can't define the different build or the infinite destinations of the decks, I can only try to explain the first factor, and that is why I started these series.

I knew that some people would disagree with my terms, and that is why I stated in the first article that I would explain what those terms meant to me.

I appreciate your opinion though, it helps me for further articles. 

I like your attempts to classify, but let me weigh in on this thought process of yours.  I figure my 11k words on this idea that I committed to the Magic part of the forums qualifies me for something.

First, there are aggressive players, there are casual players, and there are control players.  The first tends to go for balls-to-the-wall aggression, playing things like High Voltage and filling their deck with Savage Beatdown x16.  The second are players who play the game for fun, play "fair" decks, and don't usual mind missing mistakes.  The third are players that like to keep your opponent from playing what they wish via Bat Got Your Tongue, etc.  They adore defensive cards like Cover Fire, play teams like Darkseid to reap huge amount of progressive advantage, and tend to finish with characters costing 7 or more.

Second, there are five general deck styles, not to be conused: Off-curve, short-curve, curve, stall, and combo.  You've covered most of these decently, but some things should be noted :

*Off-curve often plays a mess of under-dropping characters, until at some point they start playing some key character (Combo) or some very large character (Stall) - examples include stalling until Circe (Combo) or unti Invisible Woman (Stall).  They may also seek to win off of 1 & 2 cost characters alone, with the occasional 3 or greater to help fill in the curve - it is most certainly the most diverse type.

*Short Curve plays curve from 1-4 or 1-5, and either burns players out or runs a ton of attack pump ot make up about 25 points of damage that won't come from regular stunning.  Also can accomidate combo decks, i.e. Migga City.

*Curve is simple to play, and often based on synergy, such as the all-Leader decks.  As you've said, it's based on larger and larger characters staying out for very long periods of time, in order to reap incremental advantage based on their presence, size, and abilities.

*Stall finds some means - see the three previous decks - to survive until turns 6+, when it starts to win.  Via a curve deck, you have Darkseid or Heralds of Glactus.  By off-curve, you have the GCPD/Batman: the Dark Knight decks.  By short-curve, you have the steps at Worlds involving Blizzard and Bullseye.  Fun to play, if nothing else because actually get to play fatties like Galactus!

*Combo can be played as a component of any of the above four decks, though in rare cases will dominate the deck entirely - such as Quickfate, or decks based around Punisher (4) or Lex Luthor: Master Manipulator.  This category of deck also includes "I Win" cards, such as Secret Six Victorious.

I think the point that really needs to be drilled in is that classify Vs. decks in any rigid way is impossible; only general assesments are viable.  The reason is that all decks are combinations of factors - the style of player, the curve of characters the deck is built with, and what the deck is actually trying to do.  You might keep that in mind for further installments.