In a recent blog I wrote, TCGplayer user concede2me commented that we should revisit the discussion on Bitterblossom. Perhaps mostly he was chiding me for being "pretty bad at magic (in almost every way)," but regardless I think it's work talking about again.
A side note: this is in no way a slam on concede2me. indeed, he has always backed up his arguments with solid fact, even back when I wrote for a certain other website and I appreciate him not simply accepting everything I say as fact to keep me in my place.
When the card Bitterblossom was first spoiled, I really liked it. No joke. I thought it would be really good. At first.
But I could not find a deck in which it would operate well. Rogues, the U/B Faeries of the time, etc. It wasn't good in my testing and I regarded it as chaff, much like exciting cards that had come out in previous sets that failed to live up to thier potential like Pact of Negation or Galepowder Mage.
I then wrote a blog called "Bitterblossom = Smokestack." You can read it (and the comments that ensued) here.
Fast forward a few weeks or so. The new U/B Faeries deck is much different than the pre-Morningtide versions or the ones that I had built and, as a result, Bitterblossom is very strong in them. In addition, it seems to work well in the U/G Rock deck that has been popping up.
I have to say that I was very wrong on this one. As of right now, Bitterblossom is one of the top 5 Morningtide rares in Standard right now.
I'm not apologizing for my previous blog, just admitting how dumb I look now. As a writer, I wouldn't be very good if I only predicted that cards like Countryside Crusher would be popular and cards like Indominable Ancients wouldn't see a lot of constructed play. As a result, I look foolish in retrospect. Indeed, I have made predicitons that subsequently made me look dumb like this before. On an episode of The Magic Show, I predicted that Aven Mindcensor would make the Martyr-Tron deck playable again. I, obviously, was wrong.
But I have been right just about as often as I have been wrong. In that same episode of The Magic Show, I (and my friend Nick Miller, who correctly predicted that Mindcensor wouldn't make Martyr playable again) predicted that Horizon Canopy would be the most popular of the Future Sight lands. We were slammed for that prediction. We have, however, been mostly correct on that prediction.
I am not a professional player. Someday I hope to be, but I am nowhere close right now. It just so happens that I have a soapbox and a bullhorn (so to speak) that make my opinions much more heard than many other players of my skill level.
I am not a bad player. You all can go look at my DCI page. See? I'm not terrible. I'm just not a great player, and some missteps I have made (such as my failed performance at the most recent Standard Open and blogs like the original Bitterblossom list) are particularly visible and open to scrutiny.
I will not change the way I write, you can believe that. I will make unpopular predictions and outlandish comments and start discussions. I wouldn't be a very good writer if I didn't, or nearly as popular of a blogger as I currently am.
People make mistakes. I make my fair share.
Chalk this one up as "Mistake #374: Bitterblossom doesn't, as previously reported, suck."
Reubs
Tags: Tmp The Main Phase Bitterblossom Standard Faeries
Related to:
Magic: the Gathering