Welcome Guest Login or Signup
The Collectible Game Player Community
MY ACCOUNT -:- BLOGS -:- USERS -:- GALLERY -:- FORUM -:- GROUPS -:- POLLS -:- QUIZZES
BLOGS   WRITE NEW BLOG   EDIT BLOGS  
 
RSS
Yugioh Article Writing: The Rant
Posted On 01/18/2008 00:13:38 by MagicDrafter - Read 1122 time(s)

Before I start, I just want to say something completely irrelevant. Colons are the hottest thing right now. How many movies have a colon to mark a series, and even some movies that are not a series have a colon. Colons are great. When in doubt, use a colon. But keep in mind, like all things Spanish, it is dangerous. End digression.


What a time for Yugioh article writing! Quality articles are pumped out daily. Just awesome. Awesome indeed. A while ago, we have Jerome McHale writing about a deck with an interaction that just doesn't work. For those who didn't catch it, Giant Orc's effect is a continuous effect and Shadow-Imprisoning Mirror does not negate continuous effects. But that's an understandable mistake since few people even know Giant Orc's effect is a continuous effect, and Jerome usually writes good stuff. Then we have Matt Murphy who publicly states that Light and Darkness Dragon works well with Card of Safe Return. At least the deck garage's name sounds good. This is my personal pet peeve, but doesn't Bryan Camareno write about the same thing every time? Ok, I get it. Play with respect, persistence and other good stuff in life. But I guess all good writers need to word the same thing in different manners to take up room. Oh well, he seems like a nice guy, and his picture has a happy face. No, not the cartoon one but literally a happy face.


And of course, we can't forget this site's own feature writer, who continues his ramblings, or analyses as he calls them, on various decks. He's also the only featured article writer which really doesn't help in conveying any other opinions or writing styles to those who are too lazy to search for them elsewhere. Mr. C deserves his own paragraph -- that's how great he is. Don't get upset yet, please. Try not to read the following with the thought of countering me, but rather read it with an open mind. If you can't, I suggest you stop reading. As well, any sarcasm is simply to make the blog an easier read. The disclaimer ends here!


So how should we playtest an aggressive deck? The answer is obvious: don't! Nicely written Mr. C. Apparently, aggressive decks just win regardless of what is put in to try to stop them. Another brilliant observation! I guess everyone should play aggressie decks then. Did you also know Volcanic Rocket is very important in the PC match up? I sure didn't, but I do recall it being important in pretty much every match up known to Yugioh players. He then gives a tournament report about him utilizing a deck that was last minute made. I don't know about you people but in my days, if I were writing an article about a children's card game that I get reimbursed for, I would make sure that my deck would at least have a decent amount of playtesting. I would also write down my side deck seeing as how it'll be in a featured article. I guess Mr. C is just too modern for me.


I said he would get a single paragraph. I lied. I just didn't think there would be so much to talk about. There's really no logical disconnection between this paragraph and the last, but it's easier on the eyes. Mr. C's plan against Macro is to do everything in one big turn. Brilliant plan, except how the deuce does one get around Macro's permission? I guess it worked in his round 1, but the fact that Mr. C mentions no permission in that round makes me assume his opponent didn't run any, and that's obviously a suboptimal build. If his opponent did run them, his lack of mention of them would imply the report lacks detail. That's bad for a featured article.


As an exercise, try looking for the stuff I mentioned and while you're at it, read the articles again and then think about it. All the "analyses" are just so obvious, at least those that are actually correct. Remember, just because some one says so doesn't make it true. First, here's something blatantly obvious that was written: "While the side deck is going to be important, it's best to get a feel for how your deck does in game 1 and worry about side deck games when it comes to that". Now did anyone of you not know that before already? Here's a likely answer: no. Now how about this: "Demise is focused mainly on luck". Is that true? First, a deck can't really focus on luck, well, unless it's a deck based around Second Coin Toss or something, but other than that, no. Any deck benefits from luck, but Demise just seems more so because it's focus on speed amplifies the effects of luck.


That's all I got for that topic. Bring on the flames! Althought it would be nice to keep them intelligent and nonoffensive, or thou shall be ignored, nor am I in anyway encouraging flames. Rather, I hope that aspiring article or tip writers can take this as a what not to do tip. But it's unsatisfying to talk about nothing about Yugioh gameplay in a blog about Yugioh, so let's just talk about why the Exodia Turbo deck sucks. I hope I can use "sucks", but I'm not a featured so writer so I don't really care about using slang, run on sentences, seplling mistaks or even proper grammar.


For those who don't know, Exodia Turbo is the deck where a plethora of cards that replaces themselves through card draw, like Jar of Greed, are used in conjuction with Accumulated Fortune to thin the deck out in a few turns by which time Exodia is already in hand for the win. Sadly, the idea will never fly. Why? Because each drawn piece of Exodia gives less card to actually form chains and thins out the deck. For example, with 3 Exodia piece in hand and let's say 3 other cards, because there's limited amount of advantage gaining in the deck outside of Accumulated Fortune. There's only 3 cards to for a chain, and once another Exodia piece is drawn, there are 2 cards left. Each part of the win condition weakens the deck. That's horrible, but that's not the only reason why the deck sucks. It's susceptile to just about every piece of hate thrown at it. Royal Decree means game over for the deck, and although Twister helps, a 1 for 1 trade puts the game in opponent's favour because Exodia Turbo needs a large amount of in hand cards to win. Simplification means dealing damage is easier and drawing Exodia is harder. If the deck for some reason ever becomes popular, and I doubt that's ever going to happen, D.D. Designator, Mind Crush and a jumbo jet number of disruption is waiting in the side lines.


In conclusion, don't play Exodia Turbo for consecutive purposes unless you have a brilliant tech that makes the deck tick and no one sees it coming and so are powerless to stop it. The stuff I wrote on the deck is hypocritically obvious, but hey, this is more of a blog than an article so anything goes. Have a nice day and may the heart of the cards be with you.

 

Tags: Yugioh Articles Rant Exodia Turbo



Bookmark:



Viewing 1 - 10 out of 10 Comments

02/01/2008 08:08:44

@imaninja

How can your quote be interpreted with sarcasm? If you were being sarcastic, then you must appreciate my blog, in which case I'm happy, although saying your quote with sarcasm doesn't sound very right at all. I also didn't take it literally. The only thing non-literal about your quote is the "ounce" of Yugioh content, and obviously I didn't take that literally because I made no comment on it and Yugioh content obviously isn't measured in ounces.



02/01/2008 02:44:59

@MagicDrafter

    haha yea I get your point.  I guess you took my sarcastic remark about the ounce of content very literally

@NeMoo

    I do see your point.  It is nice to have articles with a good amount of time devoted to it.  However, I feel that it is only a legitimate argument if you were actually paying for these services.  Since this is completely free, I feel that you should take what you get and not complain.  You aren't really in a position to complain since you don't pay for any of this.  Should the quality of the articles sharply decline, then yeah I'd complain too.  But for a site thats totally free, I think Mr. C's articles are pretty good.

    And as for stating the obvious that most duelists already know, there are still some that wouldn't know and they shouldn't be snubbed.  We were all new to this game at one point, and it's not right for us to look at someone who might be lost if Mr. C cut the obvious stuff and say "too damn bad, don't be a noob" 



01/27/2008 15:33:02
@imaninja

"if this article had provided even an ounce of content involving the game of Yu-Gi-Oh! then I would've been grateful.  Since that is not the case, the answer is no, I'm not grateful for this article at all.  *owns hypocritical self ownage comment into the ground*"

I don't want to write flaming comments or anything, so I'll just say please the last 3 paragraphs of the blog and then look at what you posted. I hope you see my point.


01/26/2008 21:56:36

@ imaninja

  "So, because it's his own free time, you should be grateful that you get
anything at all.  If you don't like what you read, then go to another
site.  But to take the time to complain about him in your blog can only
be described with one word: stupid."

 

Sorry, but I'm assuming you don't understand the point of feature writers and writing articles. The point of those two is to help improve a readers game or provide insight on something common people overlook. The point of deck anylsis is to provide detail reasoning on why a deck functions and how it able to perform in the current metagame. Not to state the obivous or explain things that most duelists already know. Mr. C clearly comments here and explains his problems on time and workload. I mean it's great to devote your time to write articles for readers. However, if your not going to spend a good amount of time to anyalyze things more clearly or provide reasoning on card choices then whats the point of the article. I mean no one is expecting you to submit an article every few weeks, but we just ask that you submit a decent well thought out one.

 As for this person's rant, I would say he is just speaking on behalf of the duelists that just merely skip over authors like the above mentioned. It's a way to help those who are mentioned to improve themselves. Obviously, take a negative response to it as there are lots of cases that show horrible material being typed out.

This article actually does help improve the game of yu-gi-oh and a players' thoughts on the game. Where the latter of the two can be obtained thorugh reading articles on websites like these. It's nice to give honest feedback to the authors so they can try harder, or yarn for self-improvement.

 

I whole-heartly support this author and his article. 



01/25/2008 22:31:19
if this article had provided even an ounce of content involving the game of Yu-Gi-Oh! then I would've been grateful.  Since that is not the case, the answer is no, I'm not grateful for this article at all.  *owns hypocritical self ownage comment into the ground*


01/23/2008 18:50:45
@imaninja
From your logic, you should be grateful for my article instead of saying it's stupid and childish. Hypocritical self ownage.

@Mr. C
Can't really stop you from feeling good about youself. I respect your apparent high EQ and your abiliy to seperate your text with white space to make it readable.


01/23/2008 17:53:45
I love you man!!!


01/23/2008 16:30:20

First of all, I agree with your points about the writers in the beginning.  They often make mistakes and the decks they fix never get any better.  I've tested them and often times they don't work.   I used to think of these writers as genuises of the game.

HOWEVER, now I don't because of the articles of Mr. C, the very same Mr. C that you, in my opinion, unfairly slammed in your blog.  This site's featured writer devotes his own free time to write so that we can enjoy them.  So, because it's his own free time, you should be grateful that you get anything at all.  If you don't like what you read, then go to another site.  But to take the time to complain about him in your blog can only be described with one word: stupid.

Being a fellow college student, I can understand how he wouldn't have much time at all, but the point is that you should be happy you get anything at all.  I believe that for how little time he probably has, the articles are of great quality and insight.  If you disagree then thats your opinion, but to go out of your way to let everyone know you don't like the articles is pretty childish.



01/23/2008 15:12:41
He then gives a tournament report about him utilizing a deck that was last minute made. I don't know about you people but in my days, if I were writing an article about a children's card game that I get reimbursed for, I would make sure that my deck would at least have a decent amount of playtesting.

Lol, yea. Don't have like any cards anymore and I playtest only when I got the time. =/ College takes most of my free time away from me.


01/23/2008 15:11:05
Yo. As far as the "worry about the sideboard later" comment - I see lots of people who like to test matches. Be it magic or ygo I just wanted to get the point out to just play game 1 over and over to start before getting in to the sideboard stuff. You seem to be an above average player, but when I write I do try to put things you would call "obvious" into the article every now and again.

Luck / Skill - If I had to pick one for Demise, it would be luck. Things need to come together and when they do you win.

Other stuff on me - I used to care. Like. A lot. Peoples opinions were always something I took hard, but now I just dont care anymore. I've played the game 2-3 times in the past 18 months. Im sure if the site had anyone left to write I wouldn't be writing. I write pretty simple deck analysis, but do remember that you are a better player then 95% of the people who might be reading my article. I still follow the game, so I have enough to write about when it comes to forming some opinions.

But yea - I've come to learn that some people will hate your writing, some will love it, and others will simply fall the other way. You don't like my writing - that's fine, doesn't bother me at all. Heck, I just got around to noticing this was up and you posted it six days ago.

Hopefully, one of these days, I'll write something you enjoy. If not, sorry yo.

If you need to respond PM, I don't know when I'll be on again.

"Mr.C"




*** MyTCGplayer ***